| We would like to see a labelling scheme similar to the Swedish Keyhole Symbol |
 |
| GDA confuses the consumers. Mandatory 100 g/100 ml back-of-pack labelling in nutrition information panels on all food including single-servings provides comparable information, and front-of-pack labelling based on nutrient content per 100g/100 ml with an interpretative element gives the consumer the possibility to make an informed and healthy choice. |
 |
| GDA confuses the consumers. We prefer the Swedish Keyhole Symbol that guids consumers to identify the healthier options. |
 |
| We support mandatory front-of-pack multiple traffic light labelling scheme |
 |
| We support mandatory front-of-pack multiple traffic light labelling scheme |
 |
| We are very excited about the concept of Nutrient Density as developed and documented by Adam Drewnowski and The Nutrient Rich Foods Coalition as the basis for easy to use front-of-pack labelling |
 |
| We suggest a best choice labelling scheme like to the Swedish Keyhole Symbol helping consumers identify the healthier options when buying food or eating out |
 |
| GDA is supposed to guide consumers in making healthier food choices, but does rather the opposite. GDA ignores vital nutrients as vitamins and minerals. GDA should rather be seen as an abbreviation for Generally Deliberate Adulteration. |
 |
| We think that a positive system, like the Swedish Keyhole Symbol, is the best way for the consumers to identify the healthier options. GDA is a very complicated system that also ignores positive nutrients like protein, vitamins and minerals. |
 |